To date, BIM is not an evolution of the constructive process but a real revolution. The BIM approach allows the entire construction process to be improved, with benefits such as reduced project costs, faster delivery and greater design quality. Starting from the curve of MacLeamy, in showing the increase in costs of changes during the design process, the BIM method has highlighted the advantage, in terms of economic resources, to focus strategic choices in the initial planning stages and not during the documentation production. This passage imposes, on the other hand, full sharing of project information and greater coordination among stakeholders, made possible only by ensuring integrated planning. In the present research we highlight some obstacles to remedy: the change in workflow, the high cost and time of implementation. As in the traditional process what creates and often brings more difficulties is the so-called "variant", intended not as a modification of the executive project but as the occurrence of natural disasters involving a part of the territory, causing significant repercussions on the entire process constructive, which disrupts the normal procedures of adoption. We are faced with problems, needs and obligations to be resolved as soon as possible. So, in these situations, what will the designer working totally in BIM do and how? The hope is in an evolution of software and in AEC sector professionals and especially in the legislation to make huge progress and in a short time to avoid being caught unprepared.

METODO BIM: GESTIONE DEI CANTIERI EDILIZI NEI CENTRI COLPITI DA CALAMITÀ NATURALI

De Berardinis P;Laurini E;Rotilio M;LUCARELLI, MATTEO
2018-01-01

Abstract

To date, BIM is not an evolution of the constructive process but a real revolution. The BIM approach allows the entire construction process to be improved, with benefits such as reduced project costs, faster delivery and greater design quality. Starting from the curve of MacLeamy, in showing the increase in costs of changes during the design process, the BIM method has highlighted the advantage, in terms of economic resources, to focus strategic choices in the initial planning stages and not during the documentation production. This passage imposes, on the other hand, full sharing of project information and greater coordination among stakeholders, made possible only by ensuring integrated planning. In the present research we highlight some obstacles to remedy: the change in workflow, the high cost and time of implementation. As in the traditional process what creates and often brings more difficulties is the so-called "variant", intended not as a modification of the executive project but as the occurrence of natural disasters involving a part of the territory, causing significant repercussions on the entire process constructive, which disrupts the normal procedures of adoption. We are faced with problems, needs and obligations to be resolved as soon as possible. So, in these situations, what will the designer working totally in BIM do and how? The hope is in an evolution of software and in AEC sector professionals and especially in the legislation to make huge progress and in a short time to avoid being caught unprepared.
2018
978-88-492-3659-0
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11697/127821
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact