Background Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF) modulates synaptic modifications that can constitute part of brain adaptive processes in the aftermath of trauma exposure. Thus, BDNF increase could be determined either in psychiatric patients or healthy subjects who, despite exposed to stressful events, did not develop stress-related symptoms. Methods BDNF plasma levels were evaluated in a clinical and a non-clinical populations exposed to the 2009 L'Aquila earthquake and in a comparable population not exposed to such event or other trauma. Results Statistically significant differences emerged according to diagnosis (clinical samples vs. controls), while a trend toward significance was found according to exposure (exposed vs. not-exposed subjects). The exposed clinical sample showed statistically significant higher BDNF levels than the not-exposed one. Conclusions Lack of statistical difference between exposed and not exposed subjects suggests that no BDNF modification intervened after the stressful event. Exposed samples however showed the highest BDNF levels with a trend toward significance. A ceiling effect that impede the possibility of exceeding a possible maximum level in the control sample can be hypothesized. Clinical sample shows instead room for stress related BDNF increase. If so, such a BDNF increase could have a neuroprotective adaptive role after stress.

Increased BDNF levels after a trauma A pilot study on clinical and non-clinical samples, exposed or non-exposed to an earthquake

Pacitti, Francesca;Angelucci, Adrian;Domenici, Luciano;Rossi, Alessandro
2020

Abstract

Background Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF) modulates synaptic modifications that can constitute part of brain adaptive processes in the aftermath of trauma exposure. Thus, BDNF increase could be determined either in psychiatric patients or healthy subjects who, despite exposed to stressful events, did not develop stress-related symptoms. Methods BDNF plasma levels were evaluated in a clinical and a non-clinical populations exposed to the 2009 L'Aquila earthquake and in a comparable population not exposed to such event or other trauma. Results Statistically significant differences emerged according to diagnosis (clinical samples vs. controls), while a trend toward significance was found according to exposure (exposed vs. not-exposed subjects). The exposed clinical sample showed statistically significant higher BDNF levels than the not-exposed one. Conclusions Lack of statistical difference between exposed and not exposed subjects suggests that no BDNF modification intervened after the stressful event. Exposed samples however showed the highest BDNF levels with a trend toward significance. A ceiling effect that impede the possibility of exceeding a possible maximum level in the control sample can be hypothesized. Clinical sample shows instead room for stress related BDNF increase. If so, such a BDNF increase could have a neuroprotective adaptive role after stress.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Stratta-2020.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Documento in Versione Editoriale
Licenza: Dominio pubblico
Dimensione 100.98 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
100.98 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11697/145586
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact