The original version of this Article incorrectly reported Kd values in the fourth and fifth sentences of the second paragraph of the ‘Intrinsic disorder impacts auxin-driven receptor association’ section of the Results, which incorrectly read ‘We observed the general trend of reduced auxin binding affinities when altering IAA7 in TIR1·IAA7BM3 (Kd=~53 ± 2 nM), TIR1·IAA (7-7-7-12-7) (Kd=93 nM), and TIR1·IAA (7-7-7-7-12) (Kd=86 ± 25 nM) complexes in comparison to TIR1·IAA(7-7-7-7-7) (Kd=~20 ± 6 nM) (n=2–5; ± indicates SEM). We, however, measured relatively similar auxin affinities of TIR1·IAA12BM3 (Kd=~143 ± 3 nM), TIR1·IAA (12-12-12-7-12) (Kd=~172 ± 76 nM), TIR1·IAA (12-12-12-12-7) (Kd=~152 ± 63 nM), and TIR1·IAA12 (Kd= ~224 ± 66 nM); (n=2–5; ± indicates SEM) (Fig. 2b, c and Supplementary Fig. 6.)’ The correct version states ‘TIR1·IAA (7-7-7-12-7) (Kd=~57 ± 2 nM)’ in place of ‘TIR1·IAA (7-7-7-12-7) (Kd=93 nM)’, ‘TIR1·IAA (7-7-7-7-12) (Kd=~43 ± 12 nM)’ in place of ‘TIR1·IAA (7-7-7-7-12) (Kd=86 ± 25 nM)’, ‘TIR1·IAA(7-7-7-7-7) (Kd=~20 ± 3nM)’ in place of ‘TIR1·IAA(7-7-7-7-7) (Kd=~20 ± 6 nM)’, ‘TIR1·IAA (12-12-12-7-12) (Kd=~79 ± 22 nM)’ in place of ‘TIR1·IAA (12-12-12-7-12) (Kd=~172 ± 76 nM)’, ‘TIR1·IAA (12-12-12-12-7) (Kd=~133 ± 37 nM)’ in place of ‘TIR1·IAA (12-12-12-12-7) (Kd=~152 ± 63 nM)’, and ‘TIR1·IAA12 (Kd=~226 ± 34 nM)’ in place of ‘TIR1·IAA12 (Kd=~224 ± 66 nM)’. The values reported in Fig. 2 and Supplementary Fig. 6 were correct in the original version. This has been corrected in both the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.

Author Correction: Flexibility of intrinsically disordered degrons in AUX/IAA proteins reinforces auxin co-receptor assemblies (Nature Communications, (2020), 11, 1, (2277), 10.1038/s41467-020-16147-2)

Iacobucci C.;
2021

Abstract

The original version of this Article incorrectly reported Kd values in the fourth and fifth sentences of the second paragraph of the ‘Intrinsic disorder impacts auxin-driven receptor association’ section of the Results, which incorrectly read ‘We observed the general trend of reduced auxin binding affinities when altering IAA7 in TIR1·IAA7BM3 (Kd=~53 ± 2 nM), TIR1·IAA (7-7-7-12-7) (Kd=93 nM), and TIR1·IAA (7-7-7-7-12) (Kd=86 ± 25 nM) complexes in comparison to TIR1·IAA(7-7-7-7-7) (Kd=~20 ± 6 nM) (n=2–5; ± indicates SEM). We, however, measured relatively similar auxin affinities of TIR1·IAA12BM3 (Kd=~143 ± 3 nM), TIR1·IAA (12-12-12-7-12) (Kd=~172 ± 76 nM), TIR1·IAA (12-12-12-12-7) (Kd=~152 ± 63 nM), and TIR1·IAA12 (Kd= ~224 ± 66 nM); (n=2–5; ± indicates SEM) (Fig. 2b, c and Supplementary Fig. 6.)’ The correct version states ‘TIR1·IAA (7-7-7-12-7) (Kd=~57 ± 2 nM)’ in place of ‘TIR1·IAA (7-7-7-12-7) (Kd=93 nM)’, ‘TIR1·IAA (7-7-7-7-12) (Kd=~43 ± 12 nM)’ in place of ‘TIR1·IAA (7-7-7-7-12) (Kd=86 ± 25 nM)’, ‘TIR1·IAA(7-7-7-7-7) (Kd=~20 ± 3nM)’ in place of ‘TIR1·IAA(7-7-7-7-7) (Kd=~20 ± 6 nM)’, ‘TIR1·IAA (12-12-12-7-12) (Kd=~79 ± 22 nM)’ in place of ‘TIR1·IAA (12-12-12-7-12) (Kd=~172 ± 76 nM)’, ‘TIR1·IAA (12-12-12-12-7) (Kd=~133 ± 37 nM)’ in place of ‘TIR1·IAA (12-12-12-12-7) (Kd=~152 ± 63 nM)’, and ‘TIR1·IAA12 (Kd=~226 ± 34 nM)’ in place of ‘TIR1·IAA12 (Kd=~224 ± 66 nM)’. The values reported in Fig. 2 and Supplementary Fig. 6 were correct in the original version. This has been corrected in both the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/11697/181892
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
social impact