PURPOSE: To provide a microscopic and macroscopic analysis by a clinical, in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) and anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) assessment of filtering blebs after glaucoma surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 60 eyes of 48 glaucomatous patients by slit-lamp, IVCM, and AS-OCT examinations. Patients were divided into 2 groups: successful blebs (group 1, 16 patients, 27 eyes) were defined as a one-third reduction in preoperative intraocular pressure without antiglaucoma medications and failed blebs (group 2, 32 patients, 33 eyes) as a less than one-third reduction in preoperative intraocular pressure without therapy. The examinations were performed from 1 to 96 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Diffuse or cystic clinical patterns were indicative for good functionality whereas flat or encapsulation was indicative for poor functionality. When comparing successful with failed blebs, the IVCM analysis showed a greater number (P=0.014), density (P=0.009), and total area of epithelial microcysts (P=0.017) and a lower density of connective tissue (P=0.006). The AS-OCT analysis showed a lower degree of bleb wall reflectivity (P<0.001). A significant correlation was found between the clinical and AS-OCT parameters, particularly for the cystic (100%) and diffuse (74%) patterns. CONCLUSIONS: All IVCM parameters did correlate well with the bleb functionality whereas, among the AS-OCT parameters, only the bleb wall reflectivity was significantly related to the filtering capability. Clinical and AS-OCT bleb classification showed a significant degree of concordance. As a consequence, simultaneous approach by clinical, microscopic, and tomographic assessment improves the clinician's ability in the postsurgery understanding and management of bleb

Filtering bleb functionality: a clinical, anterior segment optical coherence tomography and in vivo confocal microscopy study.

CIANCAGLINI, MARCO;
2008-01-01

Abstract

PURPOSE: To provide a microscopic and macroscopic analysis by a clinical, in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) and anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) assessment of filtering blebs after glaucoma surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 60 eyes of 48 glaucomatous patients by slit-lamp, IVCM, and AS-OCT examinations. Patients were divided into 2 groups: successful blebs (group 1, 16 patients, 27 eyes) were defined as a one-third reduction in preoperative intraocular pressure without antiglaucoma medications and failed blebs (group 2, 32 patients, 33 eyes) as a less than one-third reduction in preoperative intraocular pressure without therapy. The examinations were performed from 1 to 96 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Diffuse or cystic clinical patterns were indicative for good functionality whereas flat or encapsulation was indicative for poor functionality. When comparing successful with failed blebs, the IVCM analysis showed a greater number (P=0.014), density (P=0.009), and total area of epithelial microcysts (P=0.017) and a lower density of connective tissue (P=0.006). The AS-OCT analysis showed a lower degree of bleb wall reflectivity (P<0.001). A significant correlation was found between the clinical and AS-OCT parameters, particularly for the cystic (100%) and diffuse (74%) patterns. CONCLUSIONS: All IVCM parameters did correlate well with the bleb functionality whereas, among the AS-OCT parameters, only the bleb wall reflectivity was significantly related to the filtering capability. Clinical and AS-OCT bleb classification showed a significant degree of concordance. As a consequence, simultaneous approach by clinical, microscopic, and tomographic assessment improves the clinician's ability in the postsurgery understanding and management of bleb
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11697/19459
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 20
  • Scopus 81
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 67
social impact