BACKGROUND: The impact of stroke etiology on outcomes in patients who underwent endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is still a matter of debate. We studied the effect of aterosclerotic versus cardioembolic etiology on the clinical and radiological outcome of patients with stroke due to large vessel occlusion (LVO) treated with EVT on a large sample of stroke patients enrolled in a nationwide registry. METHODS: The source of data was the Italian Registry of Endovascular Stroke Treatments, a national, prospective, observational internet-based registry including patients treated with EVT since 2011. We extracted and compared data of patients suffering from large atherosclerosis (LAA) or cardioembolic (CE) stroke. RESULTS: We included 5193 patients, 3899 CE, and 1294 LAA stroke. Patients with CE were significantly older (p < 0.001), and their stroke severity at admission was significantly higher (p < 0.001). Moreover, patients with LAA had significantly longer onset to end of procedure time, and procedure duration than CE patients. Good outcome at three months was reported in 45.2% of LAA and 45.4% of CE patients (p = 0.89). In the multivariable analysis, patients with CE had higher odds of achieving successful (OR = 1.61; 95% CI 1.35-1.92) or complete (OR = 1.40; 95% CI 1.21-1.62) recanalization Futile recanalization was detected more frequently in CE patients (OR = 1.35; 95% CI 1.18-1.61). There were no statistically significant differences in clinical outcomes (mRS 02: OR = 1.12; 95% CI 0.92-1.36). LAA patients had higher odds of sICH (OR = 0.65; 95% CI 0.49-0.85). The shift analysis showed a trend toward a better outcome in CE patients (OR = 1.19; 95% CI 0.99-1.35), which was statistically significant in subjects with anterior circulation stroke. (OR = 1.21; 95% CI 1.04-1.35). CONCLUSIONS: The study showed a better chance of successful recanalization in CE patients, a slightly better outcome in CE patients with anterior circulation stroke after adjusting for baseline confounders, despite their more unfavourable risk factor profile, and a higher chance of futile recanalization.
Procedural and Clinical Outcome of Stroke after thrombectomy according to etiology: results from a nationwide registry
Sacco, Simona;
2025-01-01
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The impact of stroke etiology on outcomes in patients who underwent endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is still a matter of debate. We studied the effect of aterosclerotic versus cardioembolic etiology on the clinical and radiological outcome of patients with stroke due to large vessel occlusion (LVO) treated with EVT on a large sample of stroke patients enrolled in a nationwide registry. METHODS: The source of data was the Italian Registry of Endovascular Stroke Treatments, a national, prospective, observational internet-based registry including patients treated with EVT since 2011. We extracted and compared data of patients suffering from large atherosclerosis (LAA) or cardioembolic (CE) stroke. RESULTS: We included 5193 patients, 3899 CE, and 1294 LAA stroke. Patients with CE were significantly older (p < 0.001), and their stroke severity at admission was significantly higher (p < 0.001). Moreover, patients with LAA had significantly longer onset to end of procedure time, and procedure duration than CE patients. Good outcome at three months was reported in 45.2% of LAA and 45.4% of CE patients (p = 0.89). In the multivariable analysis, patients with CE had higher odds of achieving successful (OR = 1.61; 95% CI 1.35-1.92) or complete (OR = 1.40; 95% CI 1.21-1.62) recanalization Futile recanalization was detected more frequently in CE patients (OR = 1.35; 95% CI 1.18-1.61). There were no statistically significant differences in clinical outcomes (mRS 02: OR = 1.12; 95% CI 0.92-1.36). LAA patients had higher odds of sICH (OR = 0.65; 95% CI 0.49-0.85). The shift analysis showed a trend toward a better outcome in CE patients (OR = 1.19; 95% CI 0.99-1.35), which was statistically significant in subjects with anterior circulation stroke. (OR = 1.21; 95% CI 1.04-1.35). CONCLUSIONS: The study showed a better chance of successful recanalization in CE patients, a slightly better outcome in CE patients with anterior circulation stroke after adjusting for baseline confounders, despite their more unfavourable risk factor profile, and a higher chance of futile recanalization.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
s00415-025-13026-y.pdf
solo utenti autorizzati
Tipologia:
Documento in Versione Editoriale
Licenza:
Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione
874.89 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
874.89 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.