Background and aims: Common bile duct stones (CBDs) can typically be treated by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in 85-90% of cases. However, in the remaining 10-15% of patients, bile duct stones cannot be extracted. In such cases, the placement of a temporary biliary plastic stent is recommended. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42023459712; October 2023). An electronic search was carried out using the following databases: PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and CENTRAL (last search: October 20, 2023). All published studies (both randomized clinical trials and non-randomized interventional studies) involving patients who had undergone ERCP for CBDs with incomplete biliary clearance were included. The risk of bias was assessed using the RoB 2.0 and ROBINS-I tools. The confidence in network meta-analysis tool was employed to estimate each study's contribution matrix within the network estimate. Results: Twenty papers (comprising 902 patients) were selected for qualitative and quantitative synthesis and were included in the standard meta-analysis, while only five studies (254 patients) were used for the network meta-analysis. The pooled success rate of stenting intervention in difficult choledocholithiasis was 79% (95% CI:71-87%). In the network meta-analysis model, ursodeoxycholic acid and single or double stenting resulted in a higher probability of being the most effective treatments. Conclusions: In cases of incomplete CBD clearance, the insertion of a temporary plastic stent achieves complete clearance in 79% of patients. Although not significantly superior in indirect comparison with stent alone, the adjunctive treatment with ursodeoxycholic acid appears to be the most likely to succeed.

Effectiveness of Plastic Stent for the Treatment of Incomplete Clearance of Common Bile Duct Stone: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Valvano, Marco
;
Capannolo, Annalisa;Fabiani, Stefano;Stefanelli, Gianpiero;Magistroni, Marco;Mosca, Marta;Faenza, Susanna;Latella, Giovanni
2025-01-01

Abstract

Background and aims: Common bile duct stones (CBDs) can typically be treated by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in 85-90% of cases. However, in the remaining 10-15% of patients, bile duct stones cannot be extracted. In such cases, the placement of a temporary biliary plastic stent is recommended. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42023459712; October 2023). An electronic search was carried out using the following databases: PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and CENTRAL (last search: October 20, 2023). All published studies (both randomized clinical trials and non-randomized interventional studies) involving patients who had undergone ERCP for CBDs with incomplete biliary clearance were included. The risk of bias was assessed using the RoB 2.0 and ROBINS-I tools. The confidence in network meta-analysis tool was employed to estimate each study's contribution matrix within the network estimate. Results: Twenty papers (comprising 902 patients) were selected for qualitative and quantitative synthesis and were included in the standard meta-analysis, while only five studies (254 patients) were used for the network meta-analysis. The pooled success rate of stenting intervention in difficult choledocholithiasis was 79% (95% CI:71-87%). In the network meta-analysis model, ursodeoxycholic acid and single or double stenting resulted in a higher probability of being the most effective treatments. Conclusions: In cases of incomplete CBD clearance, the insertion of a temporary plastic stent achieves complete clearance in 79% of patients. Although not significantly superior in indirect comparison with stent alone, the adjunctive treatment with ursodeoxycholic acid appears to be the most likely to succeed.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Latella G - J Gastrointestin Liver Dis 2025, 34, 232-240.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Documento in Versione Editoriale
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 1.2 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.2 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11697/266539
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact