This paper aims to provide a new perspective on the collaboration between Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (M&SMEs) and universities. It seeks to address a gap in the existing literature, which predominantly focuses on the analysis of collaboration between large firms and universities. This partnership is widely regarded as mutually beneficial, as M&SMEs can gain a competitive edge through innovation, while universities could leverage research outcomes and refine their academic programs. The study adopts a systematic literature review methodology and conducts a thematic analysis of articles obtained from the Scopus and Web of Science databases, employing an integrated interpretative framework based on six different perspectives: (1) who (involved actors); (2) what (collaboration inputs and outputs); (3) when (analyzed time span); (4) where (countries); (5) how (implemented collaboration modes); and (6) why (drivers, enabling factors and barriers). A total number of 82 journal articles published between 1987 and 2023 were analyzed. Based on the adopted interpretative framework, a lack of a shared conceptualization of the investigated phenomenon emerged and is associated with a relatively scarce adoption of theoretical frameworks. Moreover, a highly differentiated set of barriers and enabling factors were found, even if their interdependencies appear rarely investigated.
Collaboration between universities and micro, small and medium firms: A structured literature review
Mura, Rita;Di Flauro, Sabrina;Fratocchi, Luciano
2025-01-01
Abstract
This paper aims to provide a new perspective on the collaboration between Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (M&SMEs) and universities. It seeks to address a gap in the existing literature, which predominantly focuses on the analysis of collaboration between large firms and universities. This partnership is widely regarded as mutually beneficial, as M&SMEs can gain a competitive edge through innovation, while universities could leverage research outcomes and refine their academic programs. The study adopts a systematic literature review methodology and conducts a thematic analysis of articles obtained from the Scopus and Web of Science databases, employing an integrated interpretative framework based on six different perspectives: (1) who (involved actors); (2) what (collaboration inputs and outputs); (3) when (analyzed time span); (4) where (countries); (5) how (implemented collaboration modes); and (6) why (drivers, enabling factors and barriers). A total number of 82 journal articles published between 1987 and 2023 were analyzed. Based on the adopted interpretative framework, a lack of a shared conceptualization of the investigated phenomenon emerged and is associated with a relatively scarce adoption of theoretical frameworks. Moreover, a highly differentiated set of barriers and enabling factors were found, even if their interdependencies appear rarely investigated.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Mura et al 2025 Industry & Higher Education 2-1.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Documento in Versione Editoriale
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
44.32 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
44.32 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


