About 600 ozone sonde profiles and in situ ozone observations on 2300 aircraft flights were compared with several three-dimensional global chemistrytransport models, in the midlatitude lowermost stratosphere during 1996. The models use the same top boundary conditions and parameterized ozone chemistry. The comparisonsh owt hat the modelsu singg eneralc irculationm odel (GCM) winds do not capture the seasonal ozone accumulation in the lowermost stratosphere. The models using winds from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECWMF) overestimateo zonea bovet his maximum, especiallyd uring spring. This overestimation increases with increasing latitude. Close to the tropopause. the best agreement between models and observations is found during winter and the worst occurs during summer, where most models underestimate the mean ozone concentration. This underestimation is partly caused by inaccurate description of the relatively small-scale transport processes, mainly associated with convective activity, and partly by incomplete ozone chemistry in the parameterized scheme. The models that use assimilated winds show significant differences in calculated ozone, despite their common source (ECWMF) to calculate the transport. We illustrate that the model performance significantly depends on the ECWMF processing method and that interpolation of wind data should be avoided. In addition, the results seem relatively insensitive to vertical resolution. To improve the model performance further in this region, the horizontal resolution should be higher than 2.5° .

Chemistry-transport model comparison with ozone observations in the midlatitude lowermost stratosphere

PITARI, Giovanni;
2001-01-01

Abstract

About 600 ozone sonde profiles and in situ ozone observations on 2300 aircraft flights were compared with several three-dimensional global chemistrytransport models, in the midlatitude lowermost stratosphere during 1996. The models use the same top boundary conditions and parameterized ozone chemistry. The comparisonsh owt hat the modelsu singg eneralc irculationm odel (GCM) winds do not capture the seasonal ozone accumulation in the lowermost stratosphere. The models using winds from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECWMF) overestimateo zonea bovet his maximum, especiallyd uring spring. This overestimation increases with increasing latitude. Close to the tropopause. the best agreement between models and observations is found during winter and the worst occurs during summer, where most models underestimate the mean ozone concentration. This underestimation is partly caused by inaccurate description of the relatively small-scale transport processes, mainly associated with convective activity, and partly by incomplete ozone chemistry in the parameterized scheme. The models that use assimilated winds show significant differences in calculated ozone, despite their common source (ECWMF) to calculate the transport. We illustrate that the model performance significantly depends on the ECWMF processing method and that interpolation of wind data should be avoided. In addition, the results seem relatively insensitive to vertical resolution. To improve the model performance further in this region, the horizontal resolution should be higher than 2.5° .
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11697/5250
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 30
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 30
social impact