Interstitial lung disease (ILD) affects about 90% of patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc). It is associated with a restrictive lung disease in only 30% of patients and is progressive in an even lower percentage. A low forced vital capacity at presentation, an extent of lung fibrosis >20% as detected by lung high-resolution computed tomography, high serum interleukin-6 levels, anti-topoisomerase I antibody positivity and diffuse cutaneous SSc are each associated with SSc-ILD progression. However, no such association is absolute. Treating patients with a recent deterioration of lung function may allow to capture those with active disease. To date, cyclophosphamide (CYC) is the only drug found to stabilize or improve lung function in randomized clinical trials, but its small beneficial effect is short lived. Therefore, immunosuppressive maintenance therapy after CYC treatment is warranted. At present, however, the best therapeutical strategy after CYC therapy both in responders and in non-responders to CYC is still controversial. Based on a review of the literature, we suggest an approach to the management of SSc-ILD

Where are we going in the management of interstitial lung disease in patients with systemic sclerosis?

CIPRIANI, PAOLA;GIACOMELLI, Roberto;
2015

Abstract

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) affects about 90% of patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc). It is associated with a restrictive lung disease in only 30% of patients and is progressive in an even lower percentage. A low forced vital capacity at presentation, an extent of lung fibrosis >20% as detected by lung high-resolution computed tomography, high serum interleukin-6 levels, anti-topoisomerase I antibody positivity and diffuse cutaneous SSc are each associated with SSc-ILD progression. However, no such association is absolute. Treating patients with a recent deterioration of lung function may allow to capture those with active disease. To date, cyclophosphamide (CYC) is the only drug found to stabilize or improve lung function in randomized clinical trials, but its small beneficial effect is short lived. Therefore, immunosuppressive maintenance therapy after CYC treatment is warranted. At present, however, the best therapeutical strategy after CYC therapy both in responders and in non-responders to CYC is still controversial. Based on a review of the literature, we suggest an approach to the management of SSc-ILD
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11697/9672
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 27
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 28
social impact