Cognitive biases in accounting judgment and decision making: a review, a typology, and a future research agenda

Cognitive biases, i.e. systematic patterns of deviation from rationality, significantly affect accounting judgment and decision making (such as misinterpreting financial data), leading to adverse consequences for businesses, organisations, and society. Despite widespread acknowledgment of these effects in behavioural accounting research, there is a noticeable absence of a comprehensive review of cognitive biases. We reviewed 139 accounting articles dealing with cognitive biases in accounting judgment and decision making. We organise the literature according to the impact of cognitive biases among audit, financial accounting, and management accounting disciplines and related tasks. In doing that, we provide a typology of biases in accounting judgment and decision making considering their different antecedents – namely, easy attribution biases, emotional-driven biases, and frame dependence biases. Moreover, a future research agenda is proposed. This includes exploring overlooked biases, studying biases that may positively impact specific tasks, examining interactions and conflicts between biases, and exploring the interaction between professionals and supporting technologies (e.g. Artificial Intelligence) in understanding cognitive biases’ study, formation, and reduction.Design/methodology/approach – The framework was grounded in the relevant literature and the CSRD requirements. Findings – This paper provides companies with a novel framework for implementing the requirements of the CSRD through a SBSC. The framework specifies four key steps (i.e. identifying material themes, initial assessment, strategic formulation and action, and sustainability reporting) to integrate sustainability with corporate governance. Practical implications – The framework supports managers’ decision-making processes in linking sustainability with strategy and providing a basis for integrating sustainability with corporate governance in organizations. The paper provides a way to practically address the CSRD requirements. Originality/value – This is the first study integrating the emerging CSRD requirements with corporate governance. The paper advances discussion and debate by management scholars on how a SBSC can be practically implemented, providing details on how this may be achieved.