AI is transforming education, but adoption remains uneven. Among teachers (INDIRE, 2025), 52.4% use AI for language simulations and automated tests, while 14% reject it. A study of 293 teachers in Abruzzo reveals a preference for active methods, with limited advanced AI use. Strong correlations exist between roleplaying/ automated assessment (Rho=0.718) and problemsolving/ adaptivequizzes (Rho=0.635). Learning outcomes depend on this integration, but training gaps and lack of guidelines persist.
GENERATIVE INTELLIGENCE: A POSSIBLE REDEFINITION OF TEACHING AND FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT. A SURVEY AMONG TEACHER TRAINEES
Maria Vittoria Isidori;Henry Muccini;Clara Evangelista
2025-01-01
Abstract
AI is transforming education, but adoption remains uneven. Among teachers (INDIRE, 2025), 52.4% use AI for language simulations and automated tests, while 14% reject it. A study of 293 teachers in Abruzzo reveals a preference for active methods, with limited advanced AI use. Strong correlations exist between roleplaying/ automated assessment (Rho=0.718) and problemsolving/ adaptivequizzes (Rho=0.635). Learning outcomes depend on this integration, but training gaps and lack of guidelines persist.File in questo prodotto:
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
jsdJournal- Isidori-Muccini Ev..pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Documento in Versione Editoriale
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
481.61 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
481.61 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
