What is the literacy and agency of the university lecturer on IAG in teaching and assessment? Answering this question, detecting training needs, is the rationale of the survey on 118 Univaq teachers. 56.8% of them formulate anthropomorphic attributions, 41.2% are not prepared for the use of AI. The results on the use of docimological indicators/tests - 52% unstructured - predictive, in our hypothesis, of the ability to formulate prompts, indicate that training is urgent.
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI) AND TEACHING. BEYOND THE ‘SPONTANEOUS EPISTEMOLOGY’. LITERACY AND AGENTIVITY: A SURVEY AMONG UNIVERSITY TEACHER
M. V. Isidori;H. Muccini;
2024-01-01
Abstract
What is the literacy and agency of the university lecturer on IAG in teaching and assessment? Answering this question, detecting training needs, is the rationale of the survey on 118 Univaq teachers. 56.8% of them formulate anthropomorphic attributions, 41.2% are not prepared for the use of AI. The results on the use of docimological indicators/tests - 52% unstructured - predictive, in our hypothesis, of the ability to formulate prompts, indicate that training is urgent.File in questo prodotto:
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
JPS ISI Muccini EV 24.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Documento in Versione Editoriale
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
333.97 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
333.97 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
