Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) requires reliable spatial data to support the assessment of infrastructure conditions and potential geometric inconsistencies. Recent advances in mobile and low-cost geospatial technologies, including LiDAR-equipped smartphones and handheld SLAM-based systems, have enabled rapid and flexible point cloud acquisition, although their achievable accuracy in operational scenarios remains a key question. This study presents a comparative analysis of point clouds acquired using an iPhone 15 Pro Max equipped with a viDoc RTK Rover and a Leica BLK2GO same spatial LiDAR system, against a terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) reference dataset collected with a Leica RTC360. All datasets were georeferenced within a common GNSS-based reference framework using RTK corrections and ground control points measured with a Leica GS15 receiver. The comparison focuses on the geometric agreement between datasets through cloud-to-cloud distance analysis and the evaluation o fverticalandhorizontalpointclouddifferences.Statisticalindicatorsderivedfromopen-sourceprocessingenvironmentsareusedtocharacterizethespatialconsistencyofthemobileacquisitionswithrespecttothereferencemodel.Theresultshighlightthepotentialofbothsmartphone-basedandSLAM-basedLiDARsystemsforrapid,first-levelinfrastructureinspections,particularlyincontextswherefastdataacquisition,easeofuse,andopen-sourceworkflowsareprioritizedoverhigh-precisiondeformationmonitoring.Thestudyprovidespracticalinsightsintotheadvantagesandlimitationsoflow-costandmobileLiDARtechnologiesforoperationalSHMapplications.

Comparative Analysis of Point Clouds Acquired by iPhone 15 Pro Max Equipped with viDoc RTK Rover and Leica BLK2GO for Structural Condition Assessment

Pascucci, N.
;
Marconi, L.;Alicandro, M.;Dominici, D.;Zollini, S.
2026-01-01

Abstract

Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) requires reliable spatial data to support the assessment of infrastructure conditions and potential geometric inconsistencies. Recent advances in mobile and low-cost geospatial technologies, including LiDAR-equipped smartphones and handheld SLAM-based systems, have enabled rapid and flexible point cloud acquisition, although their achievable accuracy in operational scenarios remains a key question. This study presents a comparative analysis of point clouds acquired using an iPhone 15 Pro Max equipped with a viDoc RTK Rover and a Leica BLK2GO same spatial LiDAR system, against a terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) reference dataset collected with a Leica RTC360. All datasets were georeferenced within a common GNSS-based reference framework using RTK corrections and ground control points measured with a Leica GS15 receiver. The comparison focuses on the geometric agreement between datasets through cloud-to-cloud distance analysis and the evaluation o fverticalandhorizontalpointclouddifferences.Statisticalindicatorsderivedfromopen-sourceprocessingenvironmentsareusedtocharacterizethespatialconsistencyofthemobileacquisitionswithrespecttothereferencemodel.Theresultshighlightthepotentialofbothsmartphone-basedandSLAM-basedLiDARsystemsforrapid,first-levelinfrastructureinspections,particularlyincontextswherefastdataacquisition,easeofuse,andopen-sourceworkflowsareprioritizedoverhigh-precisiondeformationmonitoring.Thestudyprovidespracticalinsightsintotheadvantagesandlimitationsoflow-costandmobileLiDARtechnologiesforoperationalSHMapplications.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11697/283465
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact