The identification of Natura 2000 sites in Italy has led to a significant change in the geography of environmental protection, by profoundly strengthening the role of ecological and naturalistic values in a country where the collective culture is traditionally more prepared to understand cultural values. In general, the identifi-cation of Natura2000 sites, carried out according to the guidelines established by Directive 92/43/EEC, was based on a more scientific and less politically “negoti-ated” process compared to the one followed for the determination of Protected Areas, by selecting habitats of community interest and not landscape or historical and cultural values. It seems very clear that these are two different types of areas with partially overlapping values that require forms of territorial planning and governance that optimize multiple conservation goals: while Nature 2000 sites protect habitats, protected areas extend their function to cultural landscapes, his-torical heritage and traditions. The Ecological Network should be a decisive model to classify values and integrate rules, avoiding excessively specialized approaches and applying instead the typical techniques of preservation biology and connec-tivity conservation, together with routine urban and infrastructure planning tech-niques.

Protected Areas, Natura 2000 Sites and Landscape: Divergent Policies on Converging Values

ROMANO, BERNARDINO;ZULLO, FRANCESCO
2015-01-01

Abstract

The identification of Natura 2000 sites in Italy has led to a significant change in the geography of environmental protection, by profoundly strengthening the role of ecological and naturalistic values in a country where the collective culture is traditionally more prepared to understand cultural values. In general, the identifi-cation of Natura2000 sites, carried out according to the guidelines established by Directive 92/43/EEC, was based on a more scientific and less politically “negoti-ated” process compared to the one followed for the determination of Protected Areas, by selecting habitats of community interest and not landscape or historical and cultural values. It seems very clear that these are two different types of areas with partially overlapping values that require forms of territorial planning and governance that optimize multiple conservation goals: while Nature 2000 sites protect habitats, protected areas extend their function to cultural landscapes, his-torical heritage and traditions. The Ecological Network should be a decisive model to classify values and integrate rules, avoiding excessively specialized approaches and applying instead the typical techniques of preservation biology and connec-tivity conservation, together with routine urban and infrastructure planning tech-niques.
2015
978-3-319-05409-4
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11697/35727
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 4
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 2
social impact